外勤365在线登录-beat365官网下载-36500365体育在线投注

Geekom A8 评测:高级 0.5 升迷你 PC,配备 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS、32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB 固态硬盘

Geekom A8 评测:高级 0.5 升迷你 PC,配备 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS、32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB 固态硬盘

Geekom A8 评测:高级 0.5 升迷你 PC,配备 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS、32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB 固态硬盘紧凑型动力室 Geekom A 系列将卓越的性能与极其紧凑的外形结合在一起。制造商已经通过 Geekom A7 证明了这一理念的可行性。Geekom A8 基于 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS,听起来很有前途,但它应该能提供更强的性能。我们仔细观察了这款新旗舰,并根据多项基准测试分析了其性能。Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/31/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 Mini PC Desktop AMD Radeon Thunderbolt Zen 4

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types

微型 PC 的功能越来越强大,在日常性能方面丝毫不逊色于传统台式 PC。小型 PC 在效率方面也有很高的表现,从而推动了微型 PC 的使用。Geekom A8 基于 Geekom A7其优雅的设计给人留下了深刻的视觉印象。这款品质极高、功能强大的微型电脑的最高配置是基于 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB SSD。 如果您想购买 Geekom A8,目前需要支付约 950 欧元。基本配置的价格略低,为 799 欧元。不过,在实际使用中,性能应该与顶级机型相差不大,因为 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS完全相同,也有 8 个内核和 16 个线程。

Geekom A8 必须与 Geekom A7 竞争。尽管如此,我们还是要看看它与其他 Mini-PC 制造商的性能对比,他们的产品组合中也有非常强大的设备。我们在下表中列出了对比设备的概况。

Test device courtesy of Geekom

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Geekom A8ProcessorAMD Ryzen 9 8945HS 8 x 4 - 5.2 GHz, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Graphics adapterAMD Radeon 780M, Core: 2800 MHz, Adrenalin 24.5.1Memory32 GB , DDR5-5600 MT/sMainboardAMD Promontory/Bixby FCHStorageAcer N5000, 2048 GB , M.2-2280, NVMe, 1800 GB freeSoundcardAMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio ControllerConnections1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 2 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm Klinke, Card Reader: SD-Card (Full-Size)NetworkingRealtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 38 x 112 x 112Operating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 ProAdditional features120-Watt-Power-Adapter, 36 Months WarrantyWeight432 g, Power Supply: 255 g

Price949 EURNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

潜在的竞争对手比较

RatingDateModelMemoryWeightHeight

84.9 %v7 (old)05 / 2024Geekom A8R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M32768 MB432 g38 mm

87.5 %v7 (old)05 / 2024Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiUltra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core32768 MB863 g48.6 mm

83.4 %v7 (old)04 / 2024Acemagic F2AUltra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core32768 MB768 g57 mm

84.1 %04 / 2024Geekom XT12 Proi9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs32768 MB545 g37 mm

82.6 %v7 (old)03 / 2024Geekom A7R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M32768 MB417 g38 mm

82.4 %v7 (old)05 / 2024Minisforum Venus Series NAB9i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs32768 MB615 g55 mm

82.3 %v7 (old)04 / 2024Acemagic AM18R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M32768 MB600 g58 mm

Geekom A8 详细信息

外壳 - 坚固的 0.5 升铝制外壳Geekom A8 采用与 Geekom A7采用了与 Geekom A7 相同的外壳,外观和质感都非常出色。外壳完全由铝合金制成,具有极高的稳定性,优雅的设计极具现代感。Geekom A8 和 Geekom A7 的体积约为 0.5 升,是最小巧的设备之一,同时还具有强大的计算能力。相比之下,Geekom A8 在桌面上占用的空间更小,而且重量仅为 400 多克,非常轻巧。

尺寸比较

Acemagic F2A Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Acemagic AM18 Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Geekom XT12 Pro Geekom A8 Geekom A7 DIN A5 ❌

功能 - 包括 USB4 在内的多种连接虽然 Geekom A8 极为小巧,但制造商为这款迷你电脑提供了多种连接选项。四个 USB Type-A 接口已经足够,在数量上,Geekom 与大众保持一致。Geekom A8 最先进的接口是 USB4,它可以极大地扩展应用的可能性。在测试中,我们将看看与外置显卡配合使用时的表现。屏幕可以直接通过 HDMI 接口连接,不过两个 USB-C 接口也可用于图像输出。总共可以同时操作四个屏幕。另一个积极的功能是位于左侧的快速 SD 读卡器。

Geekom A8 的外部连接(来源:Geekom)

SD Card Reader

average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)Khadas MindIntel Core i7-1360P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

181.79 MB/s +4%Geekom A5AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

176.8 MB/s +1%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

175.19 MB/s 0%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

174.57 MB/s Geekom Mini IT13Intel Core i9-13900H

154.449 MB/s -12%Geekom Mini IT12Intel Core i7-1260P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

129.2 MB/s -26%Average of class Mini PC (15.1 - 214, n=25, last 2 years)

97.9 MB/s -44%Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070CIntel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

65 MB/s -63%maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)Khadas MindIntel Core i7-1360P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

200.48 MB/s +10%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

185.62 MB/s +2%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

182.85 MB/s Geekom A5AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

182.5 MB/s 0%Geekom Mini IT13Intel Core i9-13900H

180.4 MB/s -1%Geekom Mini IT12Intel Core i7-1260P (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

176.8 MB/s -3%Average of class Mini PC (18.2 - 221, n=25, last 2 years)

110.2 MB/s -40%Zotac ZBOX Magnus EN173070CIntel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)

69.9 MB/s -62%

交流无线局域网模块Geekom A8 安装了联发科技 Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 无线局域网模块。在我们的测量中,其性能表现良好,非常适合日常使用。与同类产品相比,我们的测试样品仅在某些方面胜出一筹。无线模块可处理 2.4 GHz、5 GHz 和 6 GHz 频率范围。性能测试使用的是华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器。Geekom A8 还安装了一个 RJ45 插座,可用作替代网络连接。传输速率最高可达 2.5 GBit/s。

Networking

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHzAcemagic F2AIntel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz

1770 (1584min - 1790max) MBit/s +21%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz

1761 (1734min - 1774max) MBit/s +21%Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (684 - 1771, n=47)

1462 MBit/s 0%Average of class Mini PC (684 - 1806, n=52, last 2 years)

1460 MBit/s 0%Geekom A8MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card

1458 (1382min - 1500max) MBit/s Geekom A7MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card

1375 (688min - 1438max) MBit/s -6%Geekom XT12 ProMediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card

1152 (576min - 1273max) MBit/s -21% iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHzAcemagic F2AIntel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz

1615 (767min - 1670max) MBit/s +19%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz

1562 (1198min - 1713max) MBit/s +15%Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (394 - 1890, n=45)

1418 MBit/s +5%Average of class Mini PC (394 - 1800, n=52, last 2 years)

1390 MBit/s +3%Geekom A7MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card

1367 (1268min - 1443max) MBit/s +1%Geekom A8MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card

1356 (669min - 1390max) MBit/s Geekom XT12 ProMediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card

1315 (691min - 1352max) MBit/s -3% iperf3 receive AXE11000Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz

1599 (802min - 1683max) MBit/s +45%Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (644 - 1775, n=64)

1369 MBit/s +24%Geekom A8MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card

1101 (606min - 1257max) MBit/s Average of class Mini PC (267 - 1796, n=101, last 2 years)

950 MBit/s -14%Geekom XT12 ProMediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card

892 (460min - 921max) MBit/s -19%Geekom A7MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card

858 (827min - 886max) MBit/s -22%Acemagic F2AIntel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz

838 (728min - 926max) MBit/s -24%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9MediaTek MT7921

503 (371min - 687max) MBit/s -54%Acemagic AM18Realtek RTL8852BE

455 (221min - 519max) MBit/s -59% iperf3 transmit AXE11000Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz

1566 (904min - 1695max) MBit/s +42%Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (358 - 1785, n=63)

1261 MBit/s +14%Geekom A8MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card

1105 (489min - 1222max) MBit/s Average of class Mini PC (251 - 1776, n=101, last 2 years)

889 MBit/s -20%Geekom A7MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card

831 (755min - 940max) MBit/s -25%Acemagic F2AIntel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz

709 (369min - 977max) MBit/s -36%Acemagic AM18Realtek RTL8852BE

665 (343min - 743max) MBit/s -40%Geekom XT12 ProMediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card

589 (295min - 624max) MBit/s -47%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9MediaTek MT7921

531 (255min - 725max) MBit/s -52%

Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1334 (669-1390) Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1106 (177-1337) Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1458 (1382-1500) Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1012 (571-1177) Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1080 (606-1257) Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø762 (347-841) Geekom A8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1088 (489-1222) Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø768 (738-792)

配件交货范围包括 Geekom A8 和 120 瓦电源装置。包装盒内还包括一根 HDMI 电缆和一个 VESA 安装板。

Geekom A8 的交付范围(来源:Geekom)维护Geekom 出售的 A8 都是预配置的,这意味着你不一定要拆卸设备。不过,必要时可以拆下并更换内存和固态硬盘。要拆开设备,首先需要取下底部粘好的橡胶脚垫。下面有四颗固定螺钉,用于拆卸底板。这里要小心,因为 WLAN 天线电缆的活动空间不大,可能会损坏。底板下面还有一块金属板,如果要访问固态硬盘或内存,也需要取下这块金属板。WLAN 模块也可以更换,并非永久安装。CPU 风扇位于电路板的另一侧,如果不完全拆卸就无法触及。只要稍加操作,就可以从外壳中取出整个装置(电路板和冷却装置)。

拆解 Geekom A8性能 - AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS,8 核 16 线程餈 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS确保了 Geekom A8 的出色运行速度。从技术上讲,该 SoC 基于 Zen4 架构,拥有 8 个内核和 16 个线程。如果你想购买更便宜的配置,Geekom A8 可以配备 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS时钟频率略低。

测试条件我们使用平衡电源计划进行了所有性能测试。在 BIOS 中没有更改 SoC 的性能和内存分配(512 MB),而是根据制造商的设置保持原样。BIOS 本身不提供任何更改选项。

处理器AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS 或 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS(来源:Geekom)我们的测试样品配备了 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS.它属于鹰点系列,仍然基于 Zen4 架构。与 7000 系列相比变化不大,这意味着 Geekom A8 在性能方面与 Geekom A7 没有特别大的区别。与最近推出的 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti的对决中,Geekom A8 只在某些地方胜出,但在实际使用中,你不会发现明显的差异。

有关进一步的比较和基准测试,请参阅我们的 CPU 对比表.

Cinebench R15

Cinebench R20

Cinebench R23

Cinebench 2024

Performance Rating | Cinebench 2024 | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | Blender | wPrime 2.10 | X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 | WinRAR | TrueCrypt | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 5.0 | Geekbench 4.4 | 3DMark 11 | 7-Zip 18.03 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | R Benchmark 2.5 | LibreOffice | WebXPRT 3 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | 3DMark | Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M | Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M Performance Rating - Percent

Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

58 pt Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

57.2 pt Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

56.8 pt Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

56.7 pt Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

55.5 pt Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

55.4 pt Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

52 pt Cinebench 2024

CPU Multi CoreMinisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

1067 Points +10%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

1022 Points +6%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

967 Points Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

923 Points -5%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

922 Points -5%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

746 Points -23%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

578 Points -40% CPU Single CoreMinisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

114 Points +6%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

110 Points +2%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

108 Points 0%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

108 Points 0%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

108 Points Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

106 Points -2%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

104 Points -4%Cinebench R23

Multi CoreAcemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

18497 Points +10%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

18016 Points +7%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

16795 Points Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

15979 Points -5%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

15556 Points -7%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

14659 Points -13%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

11036 Points -34% Single CoreMinisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

1901 Points +4%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

1851 Points +1%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

1825 Points Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

1824 Points 0%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

1771 Points -3%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

1747 Points -4%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

1737 Points -5%Cinebench R15

CPU Single 64BitGeekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

287 Points Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

278 Points -3%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

274 Points -5%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

270 Points -6%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

268 Points -7%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

258 Points -10%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

251 Points -13% CPU Multi 64BitMinisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

2746 Points +4%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

2738 Points +4%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

2640 Points Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

2505 Points -5%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

2470 Points -6%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

2249 Points -15%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

2121 Points -20%Cinebench R20

CPU (Single Core)Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

734 Points +3%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

715 Points +1%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

711 Points Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

701 Points -1%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

692 Points -3%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

679 Points -5%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

673 Points -5% CPU (Multi Core)Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

7196 Points +9%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

7188 Points +9%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

6591 Points Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

6277 Points -5%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

6250 Points -5%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

5691 Points -14%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

4294 Points -35%Cinebench R11.5

CPU Single 64BitGeekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

3.45 Points Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

3.34 Points -3%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

3.29 Points -5%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

3.27 Points -5%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

3.26 Points -6%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

3.13 Points -9%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

2.99 Points -13% CPU Multi 64BitMinisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

33.95 Points +8%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

33.49 Points +7%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

31.31 Points Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

29.8 Points -5%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

29.7 Points -5%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

27.25 Points -13%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

21.11 Points -33%Cinebench R10

Rendering Single CPUs 64BitMinisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

15303 Points +5%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

14561 Points Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

14374 Points -1%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

14300 Points -2%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

14015 Points -4%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

13938 Points -4%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

13378 Points -8% Rendering Multiple CPUs 64BitAcemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

95005 Points +5%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

90144 Points Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

88902 Points -1%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

84721 Points -6%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

83726 Points -7%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

75947 Points -16%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

69621 Points -23%Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU

Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

296 Seconds * -51%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

234 Seconds * -19%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

202 Seconds * -3%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

202 Seconds * -3%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

196 Seconds * Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

178 Seconds * +9%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

171 Seconds * +13%wPrime 2.10

32m Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

4.111 s * -60%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

3.523 s * -37%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

3.454 s * -35%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

3.254 s * -27%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

2.658 s * -4%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

2.648 s * -3%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

2.563 s * 1024m Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

441.275 s * -550%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

202.68 s * -198%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

186.394 s * -174%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

139.617 s * -106%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

98.222 s * -45%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

71.922 s * -6%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

67.933 s * X264 HD Benchmark 4.0

Pass 1Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

335.5 (329min - 340max) fps +13%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

325 (323min - 328max) fps +9%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

317.5 (292min - 319max) fps +7%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

298 (297min - 305max) fps Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

292.5 (291min - 296max) fps -2%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

281.5 (277min - 286max) fps -6%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

262 (259min - 282max) fps -12% Pass 2Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

158.2 (157.4min - 158.8max) fps +5%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

154.15 (153.8min - 154.3max) fps +2%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

150.65 (150.4min - 154.2max) fps Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

144.1 (143.9min - 145.6max) fps -4%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

140.8 (138.2min - 144.7max) fps -7%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

125.05 (112.4min - 132max) fps -17%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

92.2 (91min - 114.5max) fps -39%WinRAR - Result

Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

8735 KB/s +11%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

7945 KB/s +1%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

7940 KB/s +1%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

7843 KB/s Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

7723 KB/s -2%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

7490 KB/s -5%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

6428 KB/s -18%TrueCrypt

AES Mean 100MBGeekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

15.4 GB/s Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

15.1 GB/s -2%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

14.7 GB/s -5%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

13 GB/s -16%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

11.3 GB/s -27%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

11.2 GB/s -27%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

10.6 GB/s -31% Twofish Mean 100MBMinisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

2.2 GB/s +10%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

2.1 GB/s +5%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

2.1 GB/s +5%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

2 GB/s Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

1.9 GB/s -5%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

1.8 GB/s -10%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

1.7 GB/s -15% Serpent Mean 100MBGeekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

1.4 GB/s Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

1.3 GB/s -7%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

1.3 GB/s -7%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

1.2 GB/s -14%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

1.1 GB/s -21%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

1.1 GB/s -21%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

1 GB/s -29%Geekbench 5.5

Multi-CoreMinisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

13392 Points +7%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

12662 Points +1%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

12481 Points Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

12261 Points -2%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

12049 Points -3%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

10378 Points -17%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

10028 Points -20% Single-CoreGeekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

2008 Points +1%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

1996 Points Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

1946 Points -3%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

1866 Points -7%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

1856 Points -7%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

1790 Points -10%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

1746 Points -13%Geekbench 5.0

5.0 Multi-CoreMinisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

13228 Points +7%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

12438 Points 0%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

12386 Points Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

12127 Points -2%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

12019 Points -3%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

10276 Points -17%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

9892 Points -20% 5.0 Single-CoreGeekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

1918 Points +1%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

1906 Points Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

1870 Points -2%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

1821 Points -4%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

1795 Points -6%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

1710 Points -10%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

1708 Points -10%Geekbench 4.4

64 Bit Single-Core ScoreGeekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

8253 Points +1%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

8178 Points Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

7932 Points -3%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

7924 Points -3%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

7635 Points -7%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

7602 Points -7%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

6927 Points -15% 64 Bit Multi-Core ScoreGeekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

49269 Points Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

48723 Points -1%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

47960 Points -3%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

47599 Points -3%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

45250 Points -8%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

39510 Points -20%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

37359 Points -24%3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics

Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

22978 Points Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

22786 Points -1%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

22600 Points -2%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

21875 Points -5%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

20846 Points -9%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

18553 Points -19%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

16634 Points -28%7-Zip 18.03

7z b 4Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

71934 MIPS 0%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

71874 MIPS Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

70723 MIPS -2%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

70707 MIPS -2%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

66438 MIPS -8%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

55620 MIPS -23%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

47146 MIPS -34% 7z b 4 -mmt1Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

6744 MIPS +1%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

6668 MIPS Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

6545 MIPS -2%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

6136 MIPS -8%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

5881 MIPS -12%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

5560 MIPS -17%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

5485 MIPS -18%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset

Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

20.9 fps 0%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

20.9 fps Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

20.6 fps -1%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

20.5 fps -2%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

19.6 fps -6%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

16.2 fps -22%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

12.3 fps -41%R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean

Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

0.4652 sec * -7%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

0.4632 sec * -7%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

0.4627 sec * -6%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

0.4398 sec * -1%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

0.4391 sec * -1%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

0.4351 sec * -0%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

0.4346 sec * LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF

Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

54.8 s * -10%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

49.9 s * Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

49.5 s * +1%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

47.7 s * +4%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

44.5 s * +11%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

39.6 s * +21%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

37.2 s * +25%WebXPRT 3 - Overall

Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

333 Points +5%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

320 Points +1%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

316 Points Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

301 Points -5%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

291 Points -8%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

276 Points -13%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

264 Points -16%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total

Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

535 ms * -6%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

532 ms * -5%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

518 ms * -3%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

511 ms * -1%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

505 ms * Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

503 ms * -0%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

499 ms * +1%3DMark

1920x1080 Fire Strike PhysicsGeekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

27732 Points Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

27120 Points -2%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

26093 Points -6%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

26038 Points -6%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

25816 Points -7%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

25043 Points -10%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

22242 Points -20%2560x1440 Time Spy CPUMinisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

11481 Points +2%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

11298 Points Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

10926 Points -3%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

10402 Points -8%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

10397 Points -8%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

10014 Points -11%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

7985 Points -29%Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M

Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

7.454 s * -6%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

7.442 s * -6%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

7.281 s * -3%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

7.168 s * -2%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

7.112 s * -1%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

7.045 s * Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

6.751 s * +4%Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M

Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

18.402 s * -5%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

17.697 s * -1%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

17.549 s * Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

16.498 s * +6%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

16.424 s * +6%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

16.125 s * +8%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

14.879 s * +15%Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M

Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

655.388 s * -5%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

624.748 s * Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

529.929 s * +15%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK

397.363 s * +36%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H

396.475 s * +37%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H

394.754 s * +37%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H

304.446 s * +51%* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit7748

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit21082 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit90144 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit14561 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit17730

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit49325

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit2.98 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit27.66 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit3.45 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit31.31 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit287 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit2640 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit97.9 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit231.81 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)711 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)6591 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core16795 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core1825 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core108 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core967 Points

Help... in comparison

Performance Rating: Percent AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx Performance Rating

Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M

97.2 pt Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M

94.3 pt Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M

94 pt Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

80.7 pt Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

76.7 pt Average of class Mini PC

63.4 pt Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

59.2 pt Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

51.1 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace

Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M

26846 KRay/s Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M

25725 KRay/s -4%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M

25359 KRay/s -6%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

17544 KRay/s -35%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

17312 KRay/s -36%Average of class Mini PC (769 - 76534, n=110, last 2 years)

15823 KRay/s -41%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

12389 KRay/s -54%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

10476 KRay/s -61%AIDA64 / FPU Julia

Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M

113406 Points Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M

108506 Points -4%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M

107540 Points -5%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

91112 Points -20%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

88829 Points -22%Average of class Mini PC (4140 - 214250, n=110, last 2 years)

72738 Points -36%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

64350 Points -43%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

54166 Points -52%AIDA64 / CPU SHA3

Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M

4952 MB/s Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M

4769 MB/s -4%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M

4753 MB/s -4%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

4343 MB/s -12%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

4246 MB/s -14%Average of class Mini PC (290 - 9399, n=110, last 2 years)

3263 MB/s -34%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

3028 MB/s -39%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

2504 MB/s -49%AIDA64 / CPU Queen

Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M

119802 Points Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M

118174 Points -1%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M

115133 Points -4%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

99851 Points -17%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

89748 Points -25%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

87291 Points -27%Average of class Mini PC (8186 - 184747, n=110, last 2 years)

83320 Points -30%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

82291 Points -31%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia

Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M

15026 Points Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M

14663 Points -2%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M

14590 Points -3%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

10759 Points -28%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

10247 Points -32%Average of class Mini PC (408 - 30299, n=110, last 2 years)

9774 Points -35%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

8417 Points -44%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

7317 Points -51%AIDA64 / FPU Mandel

Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M

60482 Points Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M

57881 Points -4%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M

57402 Points -5%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

45718 Points -24%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

44874 Points -26%Average of class Mini PC (2088 - 113499, n=110, last 2 years)

37761 Points -38%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

31933 Points -47%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

26850 Points -56%AIDA64 / CPU AES

Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M

169431 MB/s Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M

164414 MB/s -3%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M

163604 MB/s -3%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

154066 MB/s -9%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

144741 MB/s -15%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

112254 MB/s -34%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

95500 MB/s -44%Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=110, last 2 years)

88186 MB/s -48%AIDA64 / CPU ZLib

Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

1233 MB/s +20%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

1183 MB/s +15%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M

1042 MB/s +1%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M

1029 MB/s Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M

1020 MB/s -1%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

870 MB/s -15%Average of class Mini PC (77.4 - 2346, n=110, last 2 years)

847 MB/s -18%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

745 MB/s -28%AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace

Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M

14240 KRay/s Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M

13617 KRay/s -4%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M

13517 KRay/s -5%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

9284 KRay/s -35%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

9270 KRay/s -35%Average of class Mini PC (432 - 41221, n=110, last 2 years)

8469 KRay/s -41%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

6325 KRay/s -56%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

5777 KRay/s -59%AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx

Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

45560 MPixel/s +13%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M

40655 MPixel/s 0%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M

40570 MPixel/s 0%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M

40475 MPixel/s Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

33092 MPixel/s -18%Average of class Mini PC (5333 - 92934, n=110, last 2 years)

31042 MPixel/s -23%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

24903 MPixel/s -38%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

24858 MPixel/s -39%

Cinebench R15 多回路Cinebench R15 耐久性循环测试是我们的第一个耐久性测试,目的是了解散热系统与强大的 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS 的配合情况。开始时,我们看到处理器的性能相当稳定,但在后半段略有下降。在短期内,SoC 的可用功率高达 65 瓦,但在较长的负载情况下,功率仅略低于 50 瓦。Geekom A8 处理器的温度极限被定义为 90 °C。在性能比较中,这足以让我们的微型电脑获得第三名。只有 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti和 Acemagic F2A在这项测试中表现更好。

Cinebench R15 循环期间的 CPU 指标

Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS: Ø2605 (2529.88-2677.73) Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2784 (2721.64-2831.86) Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2759 (2690.7-2800.92) Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø1545 (1395.97-2133.22) Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2410 (2285.58-2581.81) Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Intel Core i9-12900HK, Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø1981 (1895.47-2262.7) Acemagic AM18 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2489 (2476.93-2539.84)

系统性能Geekom A8 的系统性能非常出色。不过,这同样适用于已完成测试的其他测试设备。在日常使用中几乎不会有明显的差异。不过,差异是可以衡量的,即使在最高级别中仅有几个百分点的差异。在 Geekom A7在所有测试中都能轻松胜出。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity PCMark 10 / Score

Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HSAMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000

7705 Points Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HSAMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

7651 Points -1%Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185HIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

7510 Points -3%Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HSAMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000

7455 Points -3%Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

7120 Points -8%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HKIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

6435 Points -16%Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900HIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

6295 Points -18%PCMark 10 / Essentials

Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HKIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

11591 Points +2%Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HSAMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000

11333 Points Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900HIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

11273 Points -1%Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

11125 Points -2%Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HSAMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000

11114 Points -2%Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HSAMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

11097 Points -2%Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185HIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

11030 Points -3%PCMark 10 / Productivity

Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HSAMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000

11082 Points Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HSAMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

10970 Points -1%Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185HIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

10484 Points -5%Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HSAMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000

10291 Points -7%Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

8901 Points -20%Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900HIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

8114 Points -27%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HKIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

7924 Points -28%

CrossMark: Overall | Responsiveness | Creativity | Productivity CrossMark / Overall

Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HKIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

1986 Points +6%Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HSAMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000

1866 Points Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HSAMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000

1861 Points 0%Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900HIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

1860 Points 0%Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HSAMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

1828 Points -2%Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

1802 Points -3%Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185HIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

1675 Points -10%CrossMark / Responsiveness

Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HKIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

2205 Points +48%Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900HIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

1919 Points +28%Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

1700 Points +14%Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HSAMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

1541 Points +3%Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HSAMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000

1540 Points +3%Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HSAMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000

1494 Points Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185HIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

1378 Points -8%CrossMark / Creativity

Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HSAMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000

2127 Points Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HSAMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000

2072 Points -3%Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HSAMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

2030 Points -5%Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

1929 Points -9%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HKIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

1907 Points -10%Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185HIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

1883 Points -11%Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900HIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

1870 Points -12%CrossMark / Productivity

Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Core i9-12900HKIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

1996 Points +13%Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900HIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

1831 Points +4%Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HSAMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000

1781 Points +1%Geekom A8, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HSAMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000

1764 Points Acemagic AM18, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HSAMD Radeon 780M, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

1743 Points -1%Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

1717 Points -3%Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185HIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

1589 Points -10%

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy

Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

71990 MB/s +5%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M

68603 MB/s Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M

68299 MB/s 0%Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M

67161 MB/s -2%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

62397 MB/s -9%Average of class Mini PC (8377 - 154332, n=110, last 2 years)

52182 MB/s -24%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

45792 MB/s -33%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

44442 MB/s -35%AIDA64 / Memory Read

Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

75449 MB/s +22%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

64323 MB/s +4%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M

61710 MB/s Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M

61542 MB/s 0%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M

61463 MB/s 0%Average of class Mini PC (8974 - 122850, n=110, last 2 years)

52478 MB/s -15%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

48963 MB/s -21%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

47960 MB/s -22%AIDA64 / Memory Write

Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M

86974 MB/s Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M

86810 MB/s 0%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M

86273 MB/s -1%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

70596 MB/s -19%Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

65057 MB/s -25%Average of class Mini PC (8762 - 216693, n=110, last 2 years)

57760 MB/s -34%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

47201 MB/s -46%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

45952 MB/s -47%AIDA64 / Memory Latency

Acemagic F2AIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core

149 ns * -63%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core

146.1 ns * -60%Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=110, last 2 years)

94.2 ns * -3%Geekom A8AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M

91.2 ns * Geekom A7AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M

89 ns * +2%Acemagic AM18AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M

87.9 ns * +4%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Core i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

79.9 ns * +12%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs

74.7 ns * +18%* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟Geekom A8 在延迟方面表现不佳,即使使用 Edge 浏览器上网也会导致延迟值增加。开始播放 4K 测试视频后不久,延迟进一步增加。不过,Geekom A8 在播放高分辨率视频时没有任何问题。iGPU 的使用率明显较高,达到 60%。Geekom A7 的 iGPU Geekom A7的 iGPU 使用率仅为 30%。

打开多个浏览器标签页和播放 4K 视频材料时的最大延迟

Prime95 十秒后的最大延迟时间

按最长执行时间排列的驱动程序

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95

Acemagic F2AArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

2724 μs * -30%Geekom XT12 ProIris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

2151 μs * -3%Geekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

2097.9 μs * Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiArc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

2069.2 μs * +1%Geekom A7Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000

1616.1 μs * +23%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900HK, Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

1026 μs * +51%Acemagic AM18Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

900 μs * +57%* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器2 TB NVMe 固态硬盘Geekom A8 采用了我们已经在 Geekom A7 上测试过的相同型号。 Geekom A7.宏碁的型号性能稳定。宏碁 N5000 并不是速度最快的固态硬盘之一,但这款大容量存储设备在日常使用中表现出色。考虑到其紧凑的设计,N5000 没有出现任何散热问题。制造商还为该机型配备了 2 TB 的存储空间。这是一件好事,因为该设备无法安装额外的数据载体。有关更多比较和基准,请参阅我们的 比较表.

AS 固态硬盘

CDM 3

CDM 5

CDM 6

CDI

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdAcer N5000Sequential Read:

3796 MB/s

Sequential Write:

3592 MB/s

512K Read:

2074 MB/s

512K Write:

2565 MB/s

4K Read:

50.54 MB/s

4K Write:

138.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Read:

543.2 MB/s

4K QD32 Write:

610.2 MB/s

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdAcer N5000CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:

4887.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:

4668.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:

522.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:

635 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq:

3725 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq:

3669 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K:

60.65 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K:

175 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:

616.1 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:

1822 MB/s

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdAcer N5000Sequential Read:

3741MB/s

Sequential Write:

1897MB/s

4K Read:

50.3MB/s

4K Write:

171.7MB/s

4K-64 Read:

1218MB/s

4K-64 Write:

2374MB/s

Access Time Read:

0.069ms

Access Time Write:

0.072ms

Copy ISO:

2335.09MB/s

Copy Program:

885.5MB/s

Copy Game:

2376.58MB/s

Score Read:

1643Points

Score Write:

2735Points

Score Total:

5132Points

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdAcer N5000DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:

4800MB/s

DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:

4081MB/s

DiskSpd seq_read:

3114MB/s

DiskSpd seq_write:

3271MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:

1558MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:

600MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:

54.4MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:

169.3MB/s

DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:

4786MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD Drive Performance Rating - Percent

Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

94 pt Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

72.6 pt Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

65 pt Geekom A7Acer N5000

63.2 pt Geekom A8Acer N5000

62.9 pt Average of class Mini PC

57.3 pt Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

51.2 pt Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

50 pt DiskSpd

seq readGeekom A7Acer N5000

3755 (3733.85min - 3754.99max) MB/s +21%Geekom A8Acer N5000

3114 (3080.09min - 3114.48max) MB/s Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

2668 (2648.91min - 2668.42max) MB/s -14%Average of class Mini PC (413 - 4960, n=110, last 2 years)

2430 MB/s -22%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

2315 (2293.84min - 2315.26max) MB/s -26%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

2279 (2272.33min - 2279.03max) MB/s -27%Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

2178 (2158.39min - 2177.68max) MB/s -30%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

1674 (1242.56min - 1673.54max) MB/s -46% seq writeMinisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

3866 (206.78min - 3865.71max) MB/s +18%Geekom A7Acer N5000

3492 (3398.43min - 3491.76max) MB/s +7%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

3386 (3076.94min - 3385.64max) MB/s +4%Geekom A8Acer N5000

3271 (3235.73min - 3270.93max) MB/s Average of class Mini PC (339 - 5595, n=110, last 2 years)

2778 MB/s -15%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

2629 (1414.22min - 2628.56max) MB/s -20%Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

2341 (2252.02min - 2341.4max) MB/s -28%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

1348 (1117.85min - 1347.87max) MB/s -59% seq q8 t1 readGeekom A7Acer N5000

4861 (4468.61min - 4860.57max) MB/s +1%Geekom A8Acer N5000

4800 (4387.45min - 4800.17max) MB/s Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

4780 (4492.97min - 4780.46max) MB/s 0%Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

4769 (3791.02min - 4769.24max) MB/s -1%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

4684 (4089.86min - 4684.2max) MB/s -2%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

4676 (4310.07min - 4675.81max) MB/s -3%Average of class Mini PC (397 - 8430, n=110, last 2 years)

4018 MB/s -16%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

3194 (2810.81min - 3194.17max) MB/s -33% seq q8 t1 writeGeekom A7Acer N5000

4695 (4470.16min - 4694.73max) MB/s +15%Geekom A8Acer N5000

4081 (3987.52min - 4081.49max) MB/s Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

3901 (912.47min - 3901.29max) MB/s -4%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

3729 (3700.15min - 3728.95max) MB/s -9%Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

3255 (2485.13min - 3254.57max) MB/s -20%Average of class Mini PC (346 - 6669, n=110, last 2 years)

3141 MB/s -23%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

2627 (2402.52min - 2626.88max) MB/s -36%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

2212 (1222.43min - 2212.27max) MB/s -46% 4k q1 t1 readMinisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

80.9 (78.95min - 80.85max) MB/s +49%Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

64.1 (56.32min - 64.06max) MB/s +18%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

63.5 (59.81min - 63.5max) MB/s +17%Average of class Mini PC (6.85 - 87.3, n=110, last 2 years)

56.4 MB/s +4%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

55.6 (53.92min - 55.58max) MB/s +2%Geekom A8Acer N5000

54.4 (52.17min - 54.39max) MB/s Geekom A7Acer N5000

52.3 (51.85min - 52.27max) MB/s -4%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

47.3 (47.07min - 47.31max) MB/s -13% 4k q1 t1 writeMinisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

422 (409.3min - 421.98max) MB/s +149%Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

279 (237.61min - 279.08max) MB/s +65%Average of class Mini PC (29.6 - 435, n=110, last 2 years)

195.7 MB/s +16%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

187.2 (181.54min - 187.2max) MB/s +11%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

184.4 (177.6min - 184.36max) MB/s +9%Geekom A8Acer N5000

169.3 (157.77min - 169.29max) MB/s Geekom A7Acer N5000

165.9 (164.35min - 165.92max) MB/s -2%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

151.3 (148.71min - 151.28max) MB/s -11% 4k q32 t16 readMinisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

2967 (2962.7min - 2967.4max) MB/s +90%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

1824 (1239.47min - 1824.09max) MB/s +17%Geekom A7Acer N5000

1560 (1546.89min - 1559.94max) MB/s 0%Geekom A8Acer N5000

1558 (1523.21min - 1557.75max) MB/s Average of class Mini PC (102.3 - 4158, n=110, last 2 years)

1530 MB/s -2%Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

1452 (1402.67min - 1451.9max) MB/s -7%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

1143 (1091.01min - 1142.98max) MB/s -27%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

910 (889.36min - 909.64max) MB/s -42% 4k q32 t16 writeMinisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

3364 (866.38min - 3364.31max) MB/s +461%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

1583 (825.5min - 1583.41max) MB/s +164%Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

1499 (1114.25min - 1499.4max) MB/s +150%Average of class Mini PC (70.3 - 4288, n=110, last 2 years)

1441 MB/s +140%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

1434 (1410.26min - 1433.71max) MB/s +139%Geekom A8Acer N5000

600 (492.7min - 600.03max) MB/s Geekom A7Acer N5000

595 (582.97min - 594.71max) MB/s -1%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

497 (467.49min - 497.28max) MB/s -17%AS SSD

Score TotalMinisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

7931 Points +55%Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

5975 Points +16%Geekom A7Acer N5000

5177 Points +1%Geekom A8Acer N5000

5132 Points Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

4987 Points -3%Average of class Mini PC (507 - 10021, n=107, last 2 years)

4513 Points -12%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

4412 Points -14%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

3435 Points -33% Score ReadMinisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

2899 Points +76%Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

2119 Points +29%Geekom A7Acer N5000

1685 Points +3%Geekom A8Acer N5000

1643 Points Average of class Mini PC (172 - 3741, n=107, last 2 years)

1615 Points -2%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

1561 Points -5%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

1482 Points -10%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

1248 Points -24% Score WriteMinisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

3564 Points +30%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

2807 Points +3%Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

2777 Points +2%Geekom A8Acer N5000

2735 Points Geekom A7Acer N5000

2676 Points -2%Average of class Mini PC (210 - 4371, n=107, last 2 years)

2101 Points -23%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

2082 Points -24%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

1600 Points -41% Seq ReadGeekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

4349.85 MB/s +16%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

4162 MB/s +11%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

3835 MB/s +3%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

3779 MB/s +1%Geekom A8Acer N5000

3741 MB/s Geekom A7Acer N5000

3650 MB/s -2%Average of class Mini PC (483 - 6620, n=107, last 2 years)

3315 MB/s -11%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

3010 MB/s -20% Seq WriteGeekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

3936.64 MB/s +108%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

3477 MB/s +83%Geekom A7Acer N5000

2611 MB/s +38%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

2568 MB/s +35%Average of class Mini PC (326 - 5783, n=107, last 2 years)

2529 MB/s +33%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

2369 MB/s +25%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

2285 MB/s +20%Geekom A8Acer N5000

1897 MB/s 4K ReadMinisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

104.3 MB/s +107%Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

80.89 MB/s +61%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

63.3 MB/s +26%Average of class Mini PC (18.2 - 104.3, n=107, last 2 years)

59.5 MB/s +18%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

52.4 MB/s +4%Geekom A8Acer N5000

50.3 MB/s Geekom A7Acer N5000

49.7 MB/s -1%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

41.8 MB/s -17% 4K WriteMinisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

366 MB/s +113%Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

316.33 MB/s +84%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

238 MB/s +39%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

196.9 MB/s +15%Average of class Mini PC (40.8 - 366, n=107, last 2 years)

176.9 MB/s +3%Geekom A8Acer N5000

171.7 MB/s Geekom A7Acer N5000

160 MB/s -7%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

139.4 MB/s -19% 4K-64 ReadMinisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

2379 MB/s +95%Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

1602.91 MB/s +32%Geekom A7Acer N5000

1270 MB/s +4%Average of class Mini PC (94.3 - 3220, n=107, last 2 years)

1224 MB/s 0%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

1218 MB/s 0%Geekom A8Acer N5000

1218 MB/s Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

1041 MB/s -15%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

812 MB/s -33% 4K-64 WriteMinisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

2850 MB/s +20%Geekom A8Acer N5000

2374 MB/s Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

2340 MB/s -1%Geekom A7Acer N5000

2255 MB/s -5%Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

2066.57 MB/s -13%Average of class Mini PC (96.3 - 3731, n=107, last 2 years)

1671 MB/s -30%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

1649 MB/s -31%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

1204 MB/s -49% Access Time ReadAcemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

0.173 ms * -151%Geekom A7Acer N5000

0.138 ms * -100%Average of class Mini PC (0.025 - 0.288, n=107, last 2 years)

0.0905 ms * -31%Geekom A8Acer N5000

0.069 ms * Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

0.067 ms * +3%Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

0.049 ms * +29%Acemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

0.046 ms * +33%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

0.044 ms * +36% Access Time WriteAcemagic F2AKingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0

0.126 ms * -75%Average of class Mini PC (0.013 - 0.706, n=107, last 2 years)

0.1055 ms * -47%Acemagic AM18Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe

0.078 ms * -8%Geekom A7Acer N5000

0.072 ms * -0%Geekom A8Acer N5000

0.072 ms * Geekom XT12 ProLexar SSD NM7A1 1TB

0.059 ms * +18%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0

0.031 ms * +57%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiKingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

0.02 ms * +72%* ... smaller is better

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Geekom A8 Acer N5000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4786 (4324.07-4802.27) Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4683 (3872.18-4767.25) Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1320 (771.89-3141.95) Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1764 (1425.22-4795.56) Geekom A7 Acer N5000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4848 (4561.2-4857.36) Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4764 (3862.99-4794.3) Acemagic AM18 Rayson RS512GSSD710 512 GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4663 (3995.26-4684.2)

图形卡迚ケ谿オ譎る俣 AMD Radeon 780M可以在多个竞争对手中找到。作为 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HSGeekom A8 也采用了这种现代图形处理器。在交付状态下,iGPU 仅保留 512 MB 内存。虽然不多,但可以通过 UEFI 进行调整。在相同配置下 Geekom A7的性能与较新的 A8 相当。在性能对比中,我们还可以看到 AMD 的 Radeon 780M 可以赶上 英特尔 Arc 8进一步的比较和基准测试可参见我们的 图形处理器比较表.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent

Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

97.5 pt Acemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

96 pt Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

95.7 pt Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

92.9 pt Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

91.4 pt Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

54.7 pt Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

54.7 pt 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU

Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

13932 Points +3%Acemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

13636 Points +1%Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

13533 Points Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

12085 Points -11%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

11691 Points -14%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

6999 Points -48%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

6975 Points -48%3DMark

2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsAcemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

3205 Points +10%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

3193 Points +10%Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

2968 Points +2%Acemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

2912 Points 0%Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

2901 Points Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

1583 Points -45%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

1581 Points -46%1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsGeekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

8391 Points 0%Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

8354 Points Acemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

8327 Points 0%Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

7710 Points -8%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

7599 Points -9%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

5421 Points -35%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

5407 Points -35%

Unigine Heaven 4.0 | Unigine Valley 1.0 | Unigine Superposition | ComputeMark v2.1 | LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | Affinity Photo 2 Unigine Heaven 4.0

Extreme Preset OpenGLAcemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

34 fps +25%Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

31.6 fps +16%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

29.7 fps +9%Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

27.3 fps Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

26 fps -5%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

22.3 fps -18%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

21.8 fps -20% Extreme Preset DX11Acemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

35.3 fps +8%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

33.2 fps +1%Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

32.8 fps Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

32.7 fps 0%Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

32 fps -2%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

23.2 fps -29%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

22.7 fps -31%Unigine Valley 1.0

1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8Acemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

24 fps +26%Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

19.1 fps Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

18.5 fps -3%Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

17.7 fps -7%Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

17.1 fps -10%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

13.7 fps -28%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

13.3 fps -30%1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

32.4 fps +113%Acemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

20.8 fps +37%Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

18.3 fps +20%Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

15.2 fps Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

14.6 fps -4%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

13.9 fps -9%Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

12.2 fps -20%Unigine Superposition

1280x720 720p LowAcemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

11903 Points +11%Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

10702 Points Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

10491 Points -2%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

10102 Points -6%Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

9725 Points -9%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

6129 Points -43%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

5950 Points -44%1920x1080 1080p HighAcemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

3631 Points +7%Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

3391 Points 0%Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

3387 Points Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

3341 Points -1%Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

3129 Points -8%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

2113 Points -38%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

2035 Points -40%1920x1080 1080p ExtremeAcemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1920 Points +21%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

1812 Points +14%Acemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

1777 Points +12%Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

1585 Points Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

1577 Points -1%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

1060 Points -33%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

1042 Points -34%ComputeMark v2.1

1024x600 Normal, ScoreAcemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

9863 Points +11%Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

9796 Points +10%Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

8909 Points Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

7480 Points -16%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

6270 Points -30%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

3390 Points -62%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

3382 Points -62%1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTexGeekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

492 Points Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

479 Points -3%Acemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

471 Points -4%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

469 Points -5%Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

427 Points -13%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

231 Points -53%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

226 Points -54%1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArrGeekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

492 Points Acemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

486 Points -1%Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

484 Points -2%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

462 Points -6%Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

422 Points -14%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

246 Points -50%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

239 Points -51%1024x600 Normal, Mandel VectorAcemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

2589 Points +10%Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

2574 Points +9%Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

2356 Points Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1961 Points -17%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

1620 Points -31%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

860 Points -63%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

850 Points -64%1024x600 Normal, Mandel ScalarAcemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

2651 Points +13%Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

2608 Points +11%Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

2345 Points Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

1594 Points -32%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

1274 Points -46%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

872 Points -63%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

866 Points -63%1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTraceAcemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

3667 Points +14%Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

3650 Points +13%Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

3225 Points Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

3076 Points -5%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

2444 Points -24%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

1201 Points -63%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

1182 Points -63%LuxMark v2.0 64Bit

Room GPUs-onlyGeekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

1173 Samples/s Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

817 Samples/s -30%Acemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

808 Samples/s -31%Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

640 Samples/s -45%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

577 Samples/s -51%Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

549 Samples/s -53% Sala GPUs-onlyMinisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

2732 Samples/s +176%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

2349 Samples/s +137%Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

2319 Samples/s +134%Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

1522 Samples/s +54%Acemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

1512 Samples/s +53%Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

991 Samples/s Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 TiIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

5308 Points +251%Acemagic F2AIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

4928 Points +226%Minisforum Venus Series NAB9Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900HK

4215 Points +179%Geekom XT12 ProIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H

3830 Points +153%Geekom A8AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

1512 Points Geekom A7AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

1396 Points -8%Acemagic AM18AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

1371 Points -9%

Geekom A8, AMD Radeon 780MR9 8945HSMinisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPUUltra 9 185HAcemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPUUltra 7 155HGeekom XT12 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsi9-12900HGeekom A7, AMD Radeon 780MR9 7940HSMinisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsi9-12900HKAcemagic AM18, AMD Radeon 780MR7 7840HSAverage of class Mini PC SPECviewperf 12-51%-53%-60%7%-59%7%-11%1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)87.449.7 -43%49.8 -43%40.1 -54%84.7 -3%40.2 -54%83.7 -4%86 ?(13.6 - 295, n=43, last 2 years) -2%1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)86.451.3 -41%48.2 -44%37.1 -57%89 3%35.9 -58%88.5 2%73.2 ?(10.9 - 270, n=43, last 2 years) -15%1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)55.122.7 -59%23.1 -58%26.9 -51%55.4 1%27.7 -50%56.3 2%42.8 ?(8.48 - 117, n=43, last 2 years) -22%1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)190.67 -96%0.91 -95%0.4 -98%20.7 9%0.4 -98%21.3 12%10.7 ?(0.15 - 70.6, n=37, last 2 years) -44%1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)7558 -23%54.9 -27%38.3 -49%69.7 -7%39.8 -47%71.5 -5%73.1 ?(11.4 - 226, n=43, last 2 years) -3%1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)47.715.9 -67%16.9 -65%11.8 -75%60.5 27%12.2 -74%60.5 27%32.9 ?(2.53 - 137, n=40, last 2 years) -31%1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)25.819.9 -23%18.2 -29%16.6 -36%30.3 17%17.4 -33%30 16%38.8 ?(5.71 - 133, n=43, last 2 years) 50%1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)10643 -59%42.7 -60%45.3 -57%116 9%47.3 -55%116 9%80.7 ?(20.9 - 243, n=43, last 2 years) -24%SPECviewperf 13-50%-51%-56%5%-57%7%0% 3ds Max (3dsmax-06)85.848.5 -43%46.4 -46%40.1 -53%83.9 -2%39.9 -53%83.1 -3%84 ?(13.4 - 294, n=43, last 2 years) -2% Catia (catia-05)12676.8 -39%71.6 -43%51.3 -59%130 3%51.6 -59%129 2%102.5 ?(15.6 - 381, n=42, last 2 years) -19% Creo (creo-02)92.829.3 -68%29.6 -68%41.1 -56%93.4 1%40.2 -57%92 -1%85.3 ?(11.6 - 275, n=43, last 2 years) -8% Energy (energy-02)22.65.27 -77%5.69 -75%4.5 -80%23.8 5%4.39 -81%24.1 7%23.7 ?(0.92 - 310, n=41, last 2 years) 5% Maya (maya-05)10362.5 -39%59.5 -42%47.5 -54%107 4%48.3 -53%108 5%109.7 ?(15.9 - 340, n=43, last 2 years) 7% Medical (medical-02)69.225 -64%29.7 -57%14.4 -79%77.6 12%14.4 -79%79 14%51.1 ?(2.28 - 405, n=43, last 2 years) -26% Showcase (showcase-02)24.219.9 -18%18.2 -25%17.3 -29%25.4 5%17.3 -29%29.9 24%38.1 ?(5.69 - 133, n=43, last 2 years) 57% Solidworks (sw-04)97.345.6 -53%44.8 -54%57.1 -41%109 12%57.4 -41%107 10%83.2 ?(27.4 - 223, n=43, last 2 years) -14%SPECviewperf 2020-56%-58%-69%-11%-68%-9%2%3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)10.94.23 -61%5.05 -54%3.49 -68%11.1 2%3.48 -68%13 19%11.2 ?(0.78 - 87.5, n=61, last 2 years) 3%3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)316.03 -81%4.61 -85%3.05 -90%14.1 -55%3 -90%14.2 -54%18.2 ?(0.52 - 139, n=61, last 2 years) -41%3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)35.618.5 -48%17.9 -50%14.8 -58%31.4 -12%15.1 -58%31.2 -12%36.5 ?(7.73 - 126, n=61, last 2 years) 3%3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)24.611.1 -55%10 -59%7.78 -68%24.8 1%8.08 -67%24.7 0%22.5 ?(4.61 - 89.8, n=60, last 2 years) -9%3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)2114.9 -29%12.9 -39%9.69 -54%20.9 0%9.78 -53%20.7 -1%30.5 ?(5.53 - 213, n=61, last 2 years) 45%3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)65.96.24 -91%5.7 -91%6.29 -90%61.4 -7%6.67 -90%61.1 -7%40.5 ?(3.78 - 224, n=59, last 2 years) -39%3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)50.137.7 -25%35.4 -29%23.9 -52%47 -6%24.4 -51%46.7 -7%77.2 ?(11.8 - 522, n=61, last 2 years) 54%Total Average (Program / Settings)-52% /

-52%-54% /

-54%-62% /

-61%0% /

1%-61% /

-61%2% /

2%-3% /

-3%

3DMark 05 Standard

55721 points3DMark 06 Score 1366x768

45913 points3DMark Vantage P Result

41775 points3DMark 11 Performance

13321 points3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score

168113 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score

37487 points3DMark Fire Strike Score

7670 points3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score

4072 points3DMark Time Spy Score

3264 pointsHelp... in comparison

游戏性能迚ケ谿オ譎る俣 AMD Radeon 780M虽然只是一款 iGPU,但它具有良好的 3D 性能,可以玩一些游戏。为了达到足够的帧速率,必须接受细节水平方面的一些限制。游戏性能在很大程度上取决于相关游戏,不能一概而论。

要详细了解 iGPU 与其他显卡相比的性能,请参阅我们的 GPU 游戏列表.

The Witcher 3 | Borderlands 3 | GTA V | Far Cry 5 | Far Cry New Dawn | Dota 2 Reborn | F1 2020 | GRID Legends | Shadow of the Tomb Raider The Witcher 3

1024x768 Low Graphics & PostprocessingMinisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

153.5 (20.1min, 43.1P0.1, 107.8P1) fps 0%Geekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

153.5 (7.45min, 37.4P0.1, 101.7P1) fps Minisforum Venus Series UM790 ProRadeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)

135.1 fps -12%ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

130.7 fps -15%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

107.7 fps -30%Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition KitIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

102 fps -34%Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

86.9 fps -43%Khadas MindIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

85.9 fps -44%1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

49.1 (23.1min, 38.4P0.1, 40.8P1) fps +6%Geekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

46.2 (14.1min, 14.7P0.1, 16P1) fps Minisforum Venus Series UM790 ProRadeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)

43.3 fps -6%ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

42.6 fps -8%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

39.3 fps -15%Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition KitIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

33.5 fps -27%Khadas MindIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

32.3 fps -30%Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

28.9 fps -37%Borderlands 3

1280x720 Very Low Overall Quality (DX11)Geekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

102.5 fps Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

97.3 fps -5%Minisforum Venus Series UM790 ProRadeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)

90.4 fps -12%ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

86.6 fps -16%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

66.4 fps -35%Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition KitIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

54.5 fps -47%Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

51.8 fps -49%Khadas MindIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

50.7 fps -51%1920x1080 High Overall Quality (DX11)Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

33.3 fps +20%Minisforum Venus Series UM790 ProRadeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)

29 fps +4%Geekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

27.8 fps Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

26.2 fps -6%ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

17.7 fps -36%Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition KitIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

16.1 fps -42%Khadas MindIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

15.3 fps -45%Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

14.8 fps -47%GTA V

1024x768 Lowest Settings possibleGeekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

166.9 (5.05min, 125P1) fps Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

164.4 (4.9min, 111.1P1) fps -1%Minisforum Venus Series UM790 ProRadeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)

157.8 (4.54min, 111.1P1) fps -5%ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

155.4 (6.68min, 111.1P1) fps -7%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

125.5 (11.9min, 83.3P1) fps -25%Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition KitIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

124.5 (12.7min, 76.9P1) fps -25%Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

119.3 (25.1min, 76.9P1) fps -29%Khadas MindIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

112.7 (9.9min, 71.4P1) fps -32%1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8xMinisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

66.9 (3.09min, 45.5P1) fps +3%Geekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

64.7 (4.56min, 31.3P1) fps Minisforum Venus Series UM790 ProRadeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)

59.7 (4.52min, 40P1) fps -8%ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

52.2 (11.6min, 26.3P1) fps -19%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

49.2 (13.3min, 33.3P1) fps -24%Khadas MindIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

23.6 (10.9min, 18.2P1) fps -64%Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition KitIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

20.9 (10.5min, 16.7P1) fps -68%Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

18.6 (8min, 14.3P1) fps -71%Far Cry 5

1280x720 Low Preset AA:TGeekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

88 (77min) fps Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

87 (75min) fps -1%Minisforum Venus Series UM790 ProRadeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)

80 (69min) fps -9%ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

73 (65min) fps -17%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

68 (58min) fps -23%Khadas MindIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

54 (44min) fps -39%Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

50 (41min) fps -43%Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition KitIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

45 (40min) fps -49%1920x1080 High Preset AA:TMinisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

47 (42min) fps +12%Geekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

42 (33min) fps Minisforum Venus Series UM790 ProRadeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)

41 (36min) fps -2%ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

40 (35min) fps -5%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

38 (32min) fps -10%Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition KitIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

27 (25min) fps -36%Khadas MindIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

26 (23min) fps -38%Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

25 (22min) fps -40%Far Cry New Dawn

1280x720 Low PresetGeekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

76 (58min) fps Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

75 (58min) fps -1%Minisforum Venus Series UM790 ProRadeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)

70 (50min) fps -8%ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

64 (49min) fps -16%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

58 (46min) fps -24%Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition KitIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

52 (36min) fps -32%Khadas MindIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

49 (32min) fps -36%Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

46 (28min) fps -39%1920x1080 High PresetMinisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

45 (37min) fps +2%Geekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

44 (37min) fps Minisforum Venus Series UM790 ProRadeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)

40 (32min) fps -9%ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

39 (31min) fps -11%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

36 (29min) fps -18%Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition KitIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

28 (21min) fps -36%Khadas MindIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

27 (20min) fps -39%Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

25 (19min) fps -43%Dota 2 Reborn

1280x720 min (0/3) fastestMinisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

161.5 (141.6min) fps +1%Geekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

159.7 (142.1min) fps Minisforum Venus Series UM790 ProRadeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)

150.2 (132.8min) fps -6%ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

136.8 (122.1min) fps -14%Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition KitIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

113.8 (8.3min) fps -29%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

110.5 (93.1min) fps -31%Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

108.1 (86.6min) fps -32%Khadas MindIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

104.2 (79.7min) fps -35%1920x1080 high (2/3)Minisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

97.45 (86.9min) fps +10%Minisforum Venus Series UM790 ProRadeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)

89.9 (78.3min) fps +2%Geekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

88.3 (74.1min) fps ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

85.3 (74.5min) fps -3%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

69.6 (59.3min) fps -21%Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition KitIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

67.6 (58.9min) fps -23%Khadas MindIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

61.7 (51.7min) fps -30%Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

60.9 (55.7min) fps -31%F1 2020

1280x720 Ultra Low PresetMinisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

201 (180min) fps +2%Geekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

197.3 (171min) fps ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

174.3 (162min) fps -12%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

152.2 (142min) fps -23%Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

82.1 (73min) fps -58%1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16xMinisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

79.3 (67min) fps +4%Geekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

76.4 (67min) fps ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

67.2 (54min) fps -12%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

66.4 (56min) fps -13%Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

33.5 (28min) fps -56%GRID Legends

1280x720 Low PresetMinisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

150.6 (52.6min) fps +7%Minisforum Venus Series UM790 ProRadeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)

141.6 (6.33min) fps 0%Geekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

141.4 (2.69min) fps ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

129.9 (53.8min) fps -8%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

105.4 (1.237min) fps -25%Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

64.1 (26.8min) fps -55%Khadas MindIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

53.5 (25.6min) fps -62%1920x1080 High PresetMinisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

68.8 (34.8min) fps +22%Minisforum Venus Series UM790 ProRadeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)

61 (4.49min) fps +8%Geekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

56.4 (21.6min) fps ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

51.9 (10min) fps -8%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

48.2 (2.63min) fps -15%Khadas MindIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

27.1 (19.2min) fps -52%Shadow of the Tomb Raider

1280x720 Lowest PresetMinisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

109.2 fps +66%Minisforum Venus Series UM790 ProRadeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)

94.1 fps +43%ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

92.7 fps +41%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

85.7 fps +30%Geekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

65.9 fps Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

51.4 fps -22%Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition KitIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

45.5 fps -31%Khadas MindIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

43.7 fps -34%1920x1080 High Preset AA:SMMinisforum EliteMini UM780 XTXRadeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0

41.2 fps +76%Minisforum Venus Series UM790 ProRadeon 780M, R9 7940HS, 2x Kingston OM8PGP4256Q-A0 (RAID 0)

36.3 fps +55%Geekom AS 6, R9 6900HXRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, Kingston NV2 1000GB SNV2S/1000G

35.2 fps +50%ACEMagician Ace Magician AM08 ProRadeon 680M, R9 6900HX, BiWin CE480Y2D100-512G

25.2 fps +8%Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition KitIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

23.4 fps 0%Geekom A8Radeon 780M, R9 8945HS, Acer N5000

23.4 fps Khadas MindIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00

22.5 fps -4%Geekom Mini IT12Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0

19.3 fps -18%

Witcher 3 FPS chart

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M: Ø23.3 (20-28) Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core: Ø22.4 (21-24) Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core: Ø22.8 (21-25) Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø15 (13-16) Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M: Ø25.7 (20-33) Acemagic AM18 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M: Ø28.6 (27-30)

lowmed.highultraGTA V (2015)

166.9

159

64.7

24.9

The Witcher 3 (2015)

153.5

88.3

46.2

32.4

Dota 2 Reborn (2015)

159.7

122.9

88.3

82.25

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)

54.4

25.1

19.5

X-Plane 11.11 (2018)

66.3

47.8

39.9

Far Cry 5 (2018)

88

49

42

41

Strange Brigade (2018)

74.1

66.9

56.9

49.2

Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)

65.9

26.5

23.4

22.4

Far Cry New Dawn (2019)

76

46

44

41

Metro Exodus (2019)

89.2

37.4

28.9

24.1

Borderlands 3 (2019)

102.5

42.8

27.8

24.3

F1 2020 (2020)

197.3

96.9

76.4

53.2

F1 2021 (2021)

216

104.9

80.9

34.9

God of War (2022)

24.7

19.5

15.2

11.3

GRID Legends (2022)

103.4

74.6

56.4

42

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)

62

42.5

32.7

29.8

F1 22 (2022)

94.8

85.4

62.6

F1 23 (2023)

76

65.8

48.2

Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)

41.7

27.6

20.5

20.5

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)

44

33.7

22.4

20.4

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024)

179.9

137.7

127.1

F1 24 (2024)

81.3

67.8

53.7

配备两个 eGPU 的 Geekom A8 性能测试Geekom A8 提供了一个 USB4 端口,这使我们可以结合外置显卡对这款迷你电脑进行测试。我们结合 GPD G1、Razer Core X 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 对该设备进行了测试。与 Geekom A8 的 iGPU 相比,这两种图形解决方案的性能都有明显提升。与其他设备相比,性能的提升处于类似水平。GPD G1 与之差距不大,结合 OCuLink 接口后,性能可提高约 10%。在 Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti配备了这样的接口,可作为对比概述中的参考机型。

配备 AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT 的 GPD G1

配备 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti 的 Razer Core XGeekom A8 和 GPD G1(AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT)

Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Unigine Superposition | Unigine Valley 1.0 | Unigine Heaven 4.0 | ComputeMark v2.1 Performance Rating - Percent

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

99.7 pt Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

90.7 pt Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

90.6 pt Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

85.8 pt 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

41824 Points +209%Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

34851 Points +158%Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

33843 Points +150%Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

27060 Points +100%

13533 Points 3DMark

2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsMinisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

10204 Points +252%Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

9734 Points +236%Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

9703 Points +234%Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

9555 Points +229%

2901 Points 1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

29101 Points +248%Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

29015 Points +247%Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

28983 Points +247%Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

28653 Points +243%

8354 Points 3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra GraphicsMinisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

6784 Points +211%Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

6738 Points +209%Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

6735 Points +208%Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

6704 Points +207%

2184 Points 2560x1440 Speed Way ScoreMinisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

1919 Points Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

1857 Points Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

1854 Points Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

1837 Points Night Raid Graphics ScoreMinisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

116677 Points Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

100948 Points Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

100529 Points Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

93268 Points Unigine Superposition

1280x720 720p LowMinisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

19596 Points +83%

10702 Points Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

6929 Points -35%Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

6849 Points -36%Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

5014 Points -53%1920x1080 1080p HighMinisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

12194 Points +260%Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

7694 Points +127%Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

7660 Points +126%Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

5621 Points +66%

3387 Points 1920x1080 1080p ExtremeMinisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

5799 Points +266%Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

5388 Points +240%Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

5328 Points +236%Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

4275 Points +170%

1585 Points 3840x2160 4k OptimizedMinisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

7049 Points Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

6056 Points Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

6043 Points Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

4765 Points 7680x4320 8k OptimizedMinisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

2777 Points Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

2770 Points Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

2764 Points Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

2764 Points Unigine Valley 1.0

1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

98.5 fps +416%Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

96.5 fps +405%Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

96.2 fps +404%Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

91.6 fps +380%

19.1 fps 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

89.9 fps +491%Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

81 fps +433%Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

80.5 fps +430%Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

79.1 fps +420%

15.2 fps Unigine Heaven 4.0

Extreme Preset OpenGLMinisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

132.3 fps +385%Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

122.2 fps +348%Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

121.7 fps +346%Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

118.1 fps +333%

27.3 fps Extreme Preset DX11Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

130.8 fps +299%Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

129.9 fps +296%Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

129.7 fps +295%Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

123.2 fps +276%

32.8 fps ComputeMark v2.1

1024x600 Normal, ScoreGeekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

20490 Points +130%Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

20386 Points +129%Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

20340 Points +128%Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

20154 Points +126%

8909 Points 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTexMinisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

1765 Points +259%Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

1708 Points +247%Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

1703 Points +246%Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

1701 Points +246%

492 Points 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArrMinisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

1797 Points +265%Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

1760 Points +258%Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

1754 Points +257%Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

1748 Points +255%

492 Points 1024x600 Normal, Mandel VectorGeekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

4512 Points +92%Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

4457 Points +89%Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

4450 Points +89%Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

4300 Points +83%

2356 Points 1024x600 Normal, Mandel ScalarGeekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

5418 Points +131%Geekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

5375 Points +129%Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

5373 Points +129%Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

5356 Points +128%

2345 Points 1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTraceGeekom A8 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

7145 Points +122%Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

7122 Points +121%Aoostar GOD77 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4) AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

7114 Points +121%Geekom A7 (GPD G1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @USB4)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

6811 Points +111%

3225 Points

lowmed.highultraQHD4KGTA V (2015)

176.8

171.4

146.1

83

62.7

70.5

The Witcher 3 (2015)

171.8

121.5

123.5

101

72.9

53.8

Dota 2 Reborn (2015)

93.2

70.6

67.6

55.3

53.7

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)

204

129.9

84.9

64.8

36.1

X-Plane 11.11 (2018)

69.9

49.9

37.5

29.4

Far Cry 5 (2018)

115

95

93

85

80

51

Strange Brigade (2018)

237

179.1

166.7

152

109

61.3

Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)

174.4

127.9

121.4

102.7

64.3

27.8

Far Cry New Dawn (2019)

108

78

74

65

63

53

Metro Exodus (2019)

76

46.3

48

41.6

38.9

20

Borderlands 3 (2019)

104.7

93.1

84.6

75.3

59.4

31.9

F1 2020 (2020)

290

193

162.6

113.4

90.6

56.5

F1 2021 (2021)

278

225

151.2

86

64.3

33.4

Far Cry 6 (2021)

97.9

85.6

74.3

58.7

56.7

God of War (2022)

76.5

75.9

74.3

66.1

53

34.1

GRID Legends (2022)

108.1

87.1

68.3

61.2

56.5

44.5

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)

171.7

129.1

88.7

72.8

50.6

27.8

F1 22 (2022)

121.7

115.9

90.1

42.2

29.3

F1 23 (2023)

127.6

139.3

114.6

31.7

15.8

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)

89.2

75.8

65.4

59.7

40.3

18.7

Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023)

79

72

66

53

42

27

Total War Pharaoh (2023)

278.3

158.7

107.2

83.5

60.3

32.5

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023)

38

34

20

19

12

Skull & Bones (2024)

84

76

62

50

39

24

Geekom A8 和 Razer Core X(NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 Ti)

Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Unigine Superposition | Unigine Valley 1.0 | Unigine Heaven 4.0 | ComputeMark v2.1 Performance Rating - Percent

Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

99.6 pt Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

99.3 pt Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

97.4 pt Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

95.7 pt Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

95 pt 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU

Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

34990 Points +159%Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

34666 Points +156%Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

33282 Points +146%Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

32915 Points +143%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

32835 Points +143%

13533 Points 3DMark

2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsGeekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

11210 Points +286%Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

11182 Points +285%Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

11012 Points +280%Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

10777 Points +271%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

10743 Points +270%

2901 Points 1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsGeekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

25894 Points +210%Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

25462 Points +205%Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

25163 Points +201%Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

24905 Points +198%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

24657 Points +195%

8354 Points 3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra GraphicsGeekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

7114 Points +226%Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

7076 Points +224%Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

7061 Points +223%Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

7044 Points +223%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

6977 Points +219%

2184 Points 2560x1440 Speed Way ScoreGeekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

2868 Points Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

2859 Points Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

2806 Points Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

2761 Points Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

2756 Points Night Raid Graphics ScoreGeekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

112660 Points Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

110651 Points Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

102443 Points Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

100574 Points Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

97348 Points Unigine Superposition

1280x720 720p LowGeekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

34424 Points +222%Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

33894 Points +217%Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

28935 Points +170%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

27744 Points +159%Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

27313 Points +155%

10702 Points 1920x1080 1080p HighGeekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

15076 Points +345%Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

14964 Points +342%Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

14936 Points +341%Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

14751 Points +336%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

14660 Points +333%

3387 Points 1920x1080 1080p ExtremeGeekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

7146 Points +351%Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

7055 Points +345%Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

7036 Points +344%Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

7024 Points +343%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

6971 Points +340%

1585 Points 3840x2160 4k OptimizedGeekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

9335 Points Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

9205 Points Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

9193 Points Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

9173 Points Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

9039 Points 7680x4320 8k OptimizedGeekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

4061 Points Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

4050 Points Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

4013 Points Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

3995 Points Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

3966 Points Unigine Valley 1.0

1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

141.6 fps +641%Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

141.5 fps +641%Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

139.8 fps +632%Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

131.7 fps +590%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

131.4 fps +588%

19.1 fps 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

137.5 fps +805%Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

137 fps +801%Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

125.7 fps +727%Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

122.2 fps +704%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

121.1 fps +697%

15.2 fps Unigine Heaven 4.0

Extreme Preset OpenGLGeekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

174.9 fps +541%Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

174.4 fps +539%Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

169 fps +519%Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

167.3 fps +513%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

163.2 fps +498%

27.3 fps Extreme Preset DX11Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

164.9 fps +403%Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

163.2 fps +398%Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

161.9 fps +394%Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

154.3 fps +370%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

152.4 fps +365%

32.8 fps ComputeMark v2.1

1024x600 Normal, ScoreGeekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

27998 Points +214%Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

27929 Points +213%Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

27929 Points +213%Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

27847 Points +213%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

27460 Points +208%

8909 Points 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTexGeekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

2697 Points +448%Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

2691 Points +447%Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

2689 Points +447%Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

2687 Points +446%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

2667 Points +442%

492 Points 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArrMorefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

2622 Points +433%Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

2622 Points +433%Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

2622 Points +433%Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

2621 Points +433%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

2598 Points +428%

492 Points 1024x600 Normal, Mandel VectorGeekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

5776 Points +145%Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

5742 Points +144%Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

5738 Points +144%Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

5689 Points +141%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

5606 Points +138%

2356 Points 1024x600 Normal, Mandel ScalarGeekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

6325 Points +170%Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

6317 Points +169%Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

6306 Points +169%Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

6283 Points +168%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

6202 Points +164%

2345 Points 1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTraceGeekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

10594 Points +228%Geekom A7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

10578 Points +228%Geekom Mini IT12 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)Intel Core i7-1260P

10564 Points +228%Morefine M600 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

10539 Points +227%Ace Magician AM08Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE TB3)AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX

10388 Points +222%

3225 Points

lowmed.highultraQHD4KGTA V (2015)

184.6

180

171.6

107.6

94.5

101.8

The Witcher 3 (2015)

256

174.9

130.4

65.6

57.2

68

Dota 2 Reborn (2015)

176.7

160.6

153.2

142

112.5

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)

216

146.3

100.1

79

48.3

X-Plane 11.11 (2018)

140.5

124.3

95

80.6

Far Cry 5 (2018)

159

137

131

122

100

59

Strange Brigade (2018)

236

187.1

177.7

166

133.7

84.6

Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)

154.5

121.1

118.1

112.1

91

46.6

Far Cry New Dawn (2019)

134

117

112

101

92

60

Metro Exodus (2019)

138

89.5

67.7

51.2

44.9

33.4

Borderlands 3 (2019)

139.6

124.1

103.2

85

65.5

38.7

F1 2020 (2020)

231

140.8

139

110.1

94.1

61.4

F1 2021 (2021)

162

126.8

80.8

60.6

54.3

46.5

Far Cry 6 (2021)

82.7

70.9

59.9

51.9

50.1

God of War (2022)

113.1

99.9

83.8

62.9

56.9

40.4

GRID Legends (2022)

126

97.5

81.6

69.3

63

50.5

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)

177.6

140.4

100.7

81.8

62

36.3

F1 22 (2022)

71.7

65

50.8

32.2

30.5

F1 23 (2023)

80.3

80.5

63

40

34.4

15.2

Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)

110.1

90.4

78.2

78.3

60.7

37

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)

96.6

81.2

71.5

63.5

44.4

22.3

Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023)

89

82

79

61

53

33

Total War Pharaoh (2023)

302.4

176.2

104.3

79

63.2

39.3

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023)

68

64

55

42

30

11

Skull & Bones (2024)

84

78

69

53

47

31

F1 24 (2024)

88.1

84.5

69.8

46.1

35.3

15.5

排放量噪音排放Geekom A8 是一款极其紧凑的微型电脑,这意味着设备中只能容纳一个很小的散热装置。在无负载的情况下,该设备几乎是静音运行,几乎听不到任何声音。不过,在负载情况下,情况就会发生变化。也就是说,我们没有看到平均负载和最大负载之间有太大的差别,这意味着即使在低负载情况下,Geekom A8 也能很快发出声音。在峰值时,我们测得的声压级略高于 49 dB(A)。只有 Acemagic F2A在我们的测试中达到了类似的高值,而 Geekom A7在负载情况下要安静得多。

Noise Level

Idle

24.5 / 24.7 / 24.7 dB(A)Load

48.5 / 49.2 dB(A)

30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud

min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.4 dB(A)

Geekom A8R9 8945HS, Radeon 780MMinisforum AtomMan X7 TiUltra 9 185H, Arc 8-CoreAcemagic F2AUltra 7 155H, Arc 8-CoreGeekom XT12 Proi9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUsGeekom A7R9 7940HS, Radeon 780MMinisforum Venus Series NAB9i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUsAcemagic AM18R7 7840HS, Radeon 780MNoise-2%-1%-3%-12%-5%-7%off / environment *24.424.1 1%24.9 -2%25.4 -4%25.4 -4%25.4 -4%24.8 -2%Idle Minimum *24.529.8 -22%25.4 -4%28 -14%33.3 -36%27.5 -12%31 -27%Idle Average *24.729.9 -21%25.7 -4%28.1 -14%33.6 -36%28 -13%31.2 -26%Idle Maximum *24.730 -21%25.7 -4%28.5 -15%33.7 -36%33 -34%31.4 -27%Load Average *48.537.3 23%47.8 1%39.6 18%43.3 11%42.8 12%37.1 24%Witcher 3 ultra *4740.2 14%45.23 4%47.2 -0%43.2 8%44.5 5%37.6 20%Load Maximum *49.243.5 12%49 -0%44.2 10%43.3 12%44.9 9%53.7 -9%* ... smaller is better

温度Geekom A8 的铝制外壳在空转时会明显发热。不过,这并不是问题,即使在负载情况下温度也只是微升。表面温度有时甚至会下降,这表明风扇在空闲时几乎不工作,因此设备本身会积聚更多的热量。

在压力测试中,AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS 的发热温度高达 85.5 °C。这并不是一个临界值,尤其是它只出现了很短的时间。在较长时间内,CPU 的温度稳定在 77 °C以下。SoC 的功耗为 35 瓦,符合制造商的规格要求。

压力测试 Prime95,单人

FurMark 压力测试,独奏

压力测试 Prime95 + FurMark闲置模式下的 Geekom A8(正面)

Geekom A8 空转(底部)

电源装置闲置

Geekom A8 压力测试(正面)

Geekom A8 压力测试(底部)

压力测试期间的电源装置

Max. LoadIdle

39.2 °C41.9 °C41.5 °C 35.6 °C38.6 °C36.3 °C 33.4 °C34.9 °C34.5 °C

Maximum: 41.9 °CAverage: 37.3 °C

37 °C36.8 °C36.2 °C32 °C39.9 °C33.2 °C35.1 °C34.2 °C31.9 °C

Maximum: 39.9 °CAverage: 35.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 47 °C | Room Temperature 22.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)Max. LoadIdle

39.5 °C39.6 °C39.5 °C 38.1 °C38.1 °C38.4 °C 37.9 °C37.9 °C38.1 °C

Maximum: 39.6 °CAverage: 38.6 °C

36.4 °C36.3 °C36.9 °C36 °C39.7 °C37.4 °C36.9 °C36.8 °C36.2 °C

Maximum: 39.7 °CAverage: 37 °C Power Supply (max.) 33.8 °C | Room Temperature 22.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.5 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Mini PC.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.6 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F(-) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 32.5 °C / 91 F.

耗电量能源需求和由此产生的效率是 Geekom A8 的优势。我们已经在 Geekom A7 上看到了这一趋势。两款机型在这方面非常接近。特别是在空闲模式下,Geekom 的功耗很低。在平均负载下,我们测试设备的功耗为 71 瓦。Geekom A8 仅在短时间内达到 93.2 瓦的峰值。电源由一个 120 瓦的小型电源装置提供。

Geekom A8 配有电源装置(19 V;6.32 A)

供电装置(19 伏;6.32 安)

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 1.4 / 2.7 WattIdle 3.2 / 4.9 / 6.8 Watt

Load

71.3 / 93.2 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

Geekom A8R9 8945HS, Radeon 780MMinisforum AtomMan X7 TiUltra 9 185H, Arc 8-CoreAcemagic F2AUltra 7 155H, Arc 8-CoreGeekom XT12 Proi9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUsGeekom A7R9 7940HS, Radeon 780MMinisforum Venus Series NAB9i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUsAcemagic AM18R7 7840HS, Radeon 780MAverage AMD Radeon 780M Average of class Mini PC Power Consumption-78%-80%-57%-3%-117%-96%-35%-92%Idle Minimum *3.28.2 -156%9.1 -184%5.7 -78%3.8 -19%12.1 -278%9.8 -206%6.06 ?(2.7 - 14, n=62) -89%9.55 ?(2.2 - 35.9, n=111, last 2 years) -198%Idle Average *4.912.1 -147%10.3 -110%9.5 -94%4.8 2%13.2 -169%11.5 -135%8.25 ?(4.4 - 17.6, n=62) -68%11.8 ?(2.59 - 36.3, n=109, last 2 years) -141%Idle Maximum *6.814 -106%14.4 -112%16.5 -143%6.5 4%14.1 -107%15.3 -125%10.5 ?(5.2 - 27, n=62) -54%15.2 ?(2.6 - 49, n=111, last 2 years) -124%Load Average *71.353.1 26%54.9 23%53.3 25%71.9 -1%82.9 -16%75.3 -6%57.4 ?(19.7 - 93.2, n=60) 19%59.8 ?(12.9 - 170.6, n=111, last 2 years) 16%Load Maximum *93.2100.4 -8%110.4 -18%87.8 6%94.7 -2%106.8 -15%102.8 -10%76.6 ?(34.9 - 111.8, n=61) 18%103 ?(26.2 - 423, n=111, last 2 years) -11%* ... smaller is better

Power consumption with the external monitor

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.93 (3.89-6.83) Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.4 (9.08-14.4) Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.81 (3.82-6.48) Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø67.5 (54.1-87.8) Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø48.4 (45.6-52.4) Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø73.1 (66.4-82.2) Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø69.9 (55.2-93.2) Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø92.2 (78.7-114) Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø64.2 (55.6-95.8) Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø71.3 (62.5-83.3) Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø54.9 (50.2-57) Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø71.9 (56.1-82.9)

Power consumption with the external monitor

Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø72.5 (69.7-93.2) Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø99.6 (92-110.4) Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø70 (57.2-94.7) Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø73.7 (64.4-85.7) Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103 (99.2-107) Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø73 (64.8-85.1) Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø29.6 (24.6-64.4) Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø32.7 (19.4-55.3) Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø28.7 (24.1-75.1) Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø66.8 (64.3-85.9) Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø100.7 (97.2-108.6) Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø66.2 (63.5-84.2) Geekom A8 R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø71.9 (63.7-91) Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø49.7 (47.3-60.6) Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø72.8 (57.4-85.5)

Pros+ 极其紧凑坚固的 0.5 升外壳

+ 高品质的材料选择

+ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS,8 核 16 线程

+ 现代而强大的 iGPU,采用 RDNA3 架构

+ 高速内存(DDR5-5600 MT/s)

+ 多种连接选项,包括 USB4

+ 最多可同时使用四个屏幕

+ 功耗相对较低

+ 固态硬盘容量大,存储空间达 2 TB

+ 支持 UHS 的 SD 读卡器

+ 36 个月保修Cons- 冷却装置在极限状态下快速工作

- 负载时声音清晰

- 胶合橡胶脚垫

- 高 DPC 延迟

结论 - 0.5 升的小巧机箱却能提供强劲动力Geekom A8 评测:Geekom 提供Geekom A8 是一款极其小巧的电脑--体积仅为 0.5 升,但性能却非常出色。配置 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS可以持续显示出很高的工作速度。32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB SDD 硬盘为您提供了充足的配置。不过,由于设计紧凑,SoC 只能以最低的功耗运行。尽管如此,Geekom 还是能轻松胜任日常工作。在与 Geekom A7 的直接比较中,A8 稍逊一筹。

Geekom A8 采用了与 Geekom A7 相同的设计。做工精良的外壳不仅在视觉上极具质感,而且手感也令人信服。如果说有什么不足的话,那就是拆卸过程值得批评。不过,由于 Geekom 始终销售预配置的 A8,这一点可以忽略不计。作为 Ryzen 9 型号的替代品,Geekom A8 还可以订购 Ryzen 7 8845HS(799 欧元)。这样可以省下一些钱,虽然性能应该不会明显下降。不过,在固态硬盘配置方面,你必须做出选择,因为 Geekom 只提供配备 1 TB 固态硬盘的 Ryzen 7 型号。

Geekom A8 是一款性能出色的时尚迷你 PC。加上出色的做工和高品质的选材,Geekom A8 堪称高端迷你 PC。

在外部接口的选择上,Geekom A8 也无可挑剔。这款小型计算设备提供了多种连接选择,USB4 是最先进的接口,可以扩展应用范围。如果快速 iGPU(又名 AMD Radeon 780M)的性能还不够,Geekom A8 还可以通过外接显卡变身为强大的游戏电脑。

在设计方面,Geekom A8 和 Geekom A7 是我们迄今为止测试过的最漂亮的迷你 PC 之一。不过,紧凑的设计也带来了一些问题和限制。例如,外部接口在机身后部非常靠近。负载情况下的噪音水平是另一个值得批评的地方。我们希望看到制造商能提供稍好的散热装置。

价格和供应情况Geekom A8 目前的售价为 949 欧元(1030 美元),我们评测的版本为 949 欧元(1030 美元)。用户可以直接从上订购这款迷你电脑。.此外,还可以通过亚马逊订购 Geekom A8。

Geekom A8

- 05/24/2024 v7 (old)

Sebastian Bade

Chassis87 / 98 → 89%

Connectivity62 / 81 → 77%

Weight84%

Games Performance76%

Application Performance97%

Workstation79%

Temperature86%

Noise81%

Average82%

85%

Mini PC - Weighted Average

More articles related to this deviceGeekom A8 (A Series)Review•最超值的 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS?- Geekom A8 Max 迷你电脑评测 |Review•带 0.5 升机箱的 Geekom A7 评测:配备 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS、32 GB DDR5 内存和 2 TB SSD 的高级迷你 PC |Review•Geekom A5 评测:玫瑰色迷你 PC,NUC 的替代品,配备 AMD Ryzen 7 APU 和 32 GB 内存

TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 586110 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

相关推荐